Kidney Disease in HIV-Infected Patients 

Posted September 2012

Key Recommendations
Clinicians should:

  • Inform and educate HIV-infected patients about the associations between HIV and kidney disease (BIII)
  • Routinely assess kidney function in HIV-infected patients (AIII)
  • Counsel patients with HIV-associated nephropathy about the increased urgency of initiating ART (AII)
  • Assess whether dose adjustments or discontinuation of renally cleared ART medications are necessary when a patient’s glomerular filtration rate reaches ≤50 mL/min (Table 2) (AIII)


Kidney disease in the setting of HIV can pose a significant challenge to patients and clinicians by increasing the risk for AIDS-defining illness, hospitalization, and death.1-3 The importance of routine screening, even for patients not receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART),4 is underscored by the following:

  • Risk for HIV-associated nephropathy, a kidney disease that is caused directly by HIV infection
  • Use of potentially nephrotoxic agents, such as some ART medications, as well as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
  • Increased prevalence of recognized causes of kidney disease in the HIV-infected population compared with the non-HIV-infected population, including diabetes,5 hypertension,5 and liver disease6
Key Point:
HIV-infected black patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a significantly higher risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared with HIV-infected white patients with CKD.7

back to top


Clinicians should educate patients about the following (BIII):

  • The association between HIV and kidney disease
  • The role of ART in prevention of HIVAN
  • Importance of routine monitoring appointments to assess for other causes of kidney disease

Patient education about preserving kidney function, even for those who are asymptomatic for kidney disease, should emphasize the importance of ART to prevent HIVAN,8,9 as well as the importance of keeping routine monitoring appointments to assess for other causes of kidney disease, including medication-related nephrotoxicity, hypertension, and diabetes.

back to top


A. Acute Renal Failure

Acute renal failure (ARF), also known as acute kidney injury, is characterized by a rapid loss of kidney function,10 including the capacity to excrete waste and maintain fluid balance. In HIV-infected patients, immunodeficiency may be the greatest risk factor for ARF.6 However, many of the common risk factors for ARF are similar in both the HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected populations, such as older age, diabetes, and exposure to nephrotoxic agents. Many agents used to treat opportunistic infections, as well as certain antiretroviral medications used in the primary treatment of HIV, have nephrotoxic potential.11 ARF in HIV-infected patients in ambulatory care settings is most frequently due to pre-renal azotemia or acute tubular necrosis, possibly caused by exposure to nephrotoxic agents.11 Unlike CKD, race has not been clearly established as a risk factor for ARF.

Appendix A provides information about the reported prevalence of ARF among HIV-infected patients.

back to top

B. Chronic Kidney Disease

CKD is defined as either proteinuria, a marker of kidney damage, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min for ≥3 months. Hypertension and diabetes are important causes of CKD in HIV. In one cross-sectional analysis, 55% of patients with HIV and CKD had hypertension and 20% had diabetes.12

There is a higher prevalence of both HIV and CKD among blacks compared with whites. CKD in the setting of HIV is more likely to progress to ESRD in black patients. Genetic factors unique to individuals of African descent, and not to whites, are associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and non-diabetic ESRD.13-17 An allele that confers protection against infection by Trypanosoma brucei, a parasite commonly found in Africa, has been linked to greater susceptibility to non-diabetic kidney disease among blacks.17 The presence of this allele among blacks in the United States may contribute to the higher incidence of advanced kidney disease in this population.17

Other known risk factors include hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection, family history, increased viral load levels (>4000 copies/mL), reduced CD4 cell count (<350 cells/mm3), and older age, although GFR does naturally decline with age.11 It is estimated that as many as 40% of individuals older than 70 years meet criteria for CKD based on GFR levels <60 mL/min. These cases may be misclassified because the distinction between physiologic aging and CKD at or near a GFR of 60 mL/min is unclear. CKD risk factors, including arteriosclerosis, hypertension, and diabetes, increase with age, and development and/or progression of kidney disease may occur when these risk factors increase in elderly patients.

Appendix B provides information about the reported prevalence of CKD among HIV-infected patients.

back to top


Clinicians should routinely assess kidney function in all HIV-infected patients. A renal assessment should include:

  • Glomerular filtration rate estimated from serum creatinine (baseline and at least every 6 months) (AII)
  • Blood urea nitrogen (baseline and at least every 6 months) (AIII)
  • Urinalysis, total protein, and albumin (baseline and at least annually) (AIII)
  • For patients with diabetes and no known proteinuria: calculation of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio to detect microalbuminuria (baseline and at least annually) (AI)

For patients receiving a tenofovir-containing regimen, clinicians should estimate glomerular filtration rate at initiation of therapy, 1 month after initiation of therapy, and at least every 4 months thereafter.

Routine tests for kidney disease screening in HIV-infected patients should be performed according to the recommendations above.

back to top

A. Glomerular Filtration Rate

A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <60 mL/min meets criteria for CKD; this threshold is supported by epidemiologic data linking low GFR to an increased frequency of hospitalization, cardiovascular events, or death.18 GFR can be calculated in the clinical setting using one of the following three equations:

  • Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI): Estimates GFR based on age, race, and serum creatinine. A CKD-EPI calculator can be found at
  • Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD): Estimates GFR based on age, race, sex, and serum creatinine. An MDRD calculator can be accessed at
  • Cockcroft-Gault: Calculates creatinine clearance based on serum creatinine, age, weight, and sex. A Cockcroft-Gault calculator can be accessed at

Any of these equations may be used to follow trends in creatinine as part of determining GFR. If creatinine is rising, GFR will be falling by any of these equations; if creatinine is stable, then GFR is stable by any of these equations.

These equations remain the most highly validated formulas for screening and ongoing assessment of kidney disease; however, they have not been validated in large numbers of patients with HIV infection.

Important Limitations to Calculating GFR
  • Unlike the CKD-EPI, the MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault have not been validated in people with normal kidney function and do not accurately estimate GFR in the normal range; therefore, when GFR is >60 mL/min, small but possibly meaningful changes in GFR that may indicate early kidney disease cannot be reliably measured with the MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault equations.
  • All of these equations have diminished accuracy in patients with extremes of body weight, such as body builders, amputees, and frail individuals; for these patients, a 24-hour creatinine clearance may be a better test because serum creatinine within the normal range may not correlate with a normal GFR.

Key Points:

  • The MDRD or CKD-EPI, not the Cockcroft-Gault, equations are used by clinical laboratories when reporting estimated GFR from serum creatinine; however, drug manufacturers’ recommended dose adjustments for kidney function are based on the Cockcroft-Gault equation, not the MDRD.
  • The CKD-EPI equation has begun to replace the MDRD equation when clinical laboratories report GFR. Unlike the other equations, the CKD-EPI equation has been validated in individuals with normal kidney function of >60 mL/min, although this has not been studied in the setting of HIV infection.

Other markers that reliably measure GFR are needed. Cystatin C, a member of the cysteine protease family, may be more closely correlated with changes in GFR. Evidence suggests that a proposed equation combining creatinine and cystatin C performs better than creatinine alone.19 However, no standardized measurement is currently available.

back to top

B. Urine Protein Excretion

The most sensitive indicator of kidney damage is an elevated urinary protein excretion, measured qualitatively using urine dipstick or quantitatively using a spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio or a 24-hour urine collection. A protein-to-creatinine ratio is measured from a random sample of urine, as opposed to the timed collection (e.g., a 24-hour calculation).

For patients with ≥1+ by urinary dipstick, urinary protein excretion should be quantified using the protein-to-creatinine ratio from a random sample of urine or a 24-hour urine collection. Patients with heavy proteinuria and apparently normal GFR may have worse clinical outcomes than those with moderately reduced GFR and normal proteinuria.20

The laboratory may report urinary protein and creatinine concentrations (both in milligrams per deciliter) and provide the ratio, or the laboratory may report milligrams of protein per gram of creatinine. With these results, kidney function can be assessed as follows:

  • 150 to <200 mg protein/gram creatinine: the upper limit of normal (ratio, 0.15 to <0.2) and approximately 150 to 200 mg protein excretion per 24 hours
  • 200 to <1500 mg protein/gram creatinine: mild proteinuria (ratio, 0.2 to <1.5) that is generally asymptomatic but may indicate tubulointerstitial disease or a focal glomerular abnormality
  • 1500 to ≤2000 mg protein/gram creatinine: moderate proteinuria (ratio, 1.5 to ≤0.2) suggesting glomerular disease
  • >2000 mg protein/gram creatinine: nephrotic-range proteinuria with glomerular disease
Key Point:
Microscopic hematuria and mild proteinuria (urinary protein excretion <1500 mg/day) are generally asymptomatic. They have little clinical impact alone but can indicate an early stage of a serious disease, such as acute or chronic glomerular disease. A kidney biopsy is often deferred in such circumstances until the renal disease progresses, as manifested by increasing proteinuria, decreasing GFR, or the development of hypertension.

back to top

C. Microalbuminuria Screening in Diabetic Patients

The standard dipstick is not sufficient for urinary screening in individuals with diabetes because the dipstick will not detect microalbuminuria, which predicts the subsequent development of clinically important kidney disease in patients with diabetes. In diabetic patients without gross proteinuria, the albumin-to-creatinine ratio should be used annually to detect microalbuminuria, according to American Diabetes Association Guidelines.21 A urinary albumin excretion between 30 and 299 µg/mg creatinine indicates microalbuminuria. Isolated microalbuminuria in patients without diabetes has not been clearly linked to the subsequent development of kidney failure, and screening for microalbuminuria in all patients is not currently recommended.

back to top


All patients with borderline glomerular filtration rate, regardless of age, should undergo the following diagnostic evaluation of kidney function (AII):

  • Urinalysis to screen for cells and cellular casts
  • Quantification of urinary protein excretion
  • Renal sonogram
  • Careful physical examination

Primary care clinicians should refer patients to a nephrologist when (AII):

  • The diagnosis is uncertain
  • Kidney disease is progressing rapidly
  • Stage 4 to 5 chronic kidney disease is present (see Table 1)
  • Kidney biopsy is being considered

Although most aspects of the diagnosis and evaluation of kidney disease can be performed by the primary care clinician, consultation with a nephrologist, including patient referral, may benefit the patient’s care during any stage of his/her disease.

Diagnosis of CKD is often delayed because it may be asymptomatic. CKD is often detectable only by laboratory testing. The distinction between CKD and ARF frequently requires a careful physical examination and review of the patient’s medical record, including prior laboratory tests, as well as follow-up visits and repeat laboratory testing.

CKD is categorized in five stages (see Table 1). Patients with normal GFRs but have evidence of kidney damage are classified as having stage 1 or 2 CKD.

Table 1: Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease
Stage Descriptiona GFRb (mL/min)
1 Kidney damage with normal or increased GFR ≥90
2 Kidney damage with mildly decreased GFR 60-89
3 Moderately decreased GFR 30-59
4 Severely decreased GFR 15-29
5 Kidney failure <15 (or dialysis)
Adapted from K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification22 by permission of Elsevier.
a CKD is defined as either kidney damage or GFR <60 mL/min for ≥3 months. Kidney damage is defined as pathologic abnormalities or markers of damage, including abnormalities in urine tests or imaging studies.
b GFR can be calculated in the clinical setting using one of the following equations:

  1. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Consortium (CKD-EPI). A CKD-EPI calculator can be found at
  2. Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD). An MDRD calculator can be accessed at
  3. Cockcroft-Gault. A Cockcroft-Gault calculator can be accessed at

Key Point:
As CKD progresses, more pronounced signs or symptoms may appear, including increased blood pressure, anemia, or edema (mild to severe). All forms of CKD have the potential to progress to ESRD.

Once the presence of kidney disease has been confirmed, the history and physical examination will likely provide important information about the duration of disease and predisposing risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, liver disease, or exposure to potential nephrotoxins. In addition, urinalysis to detect red cells, white cells, and cellular casts can provide information about the cause of kidney disease.

Steps for screening and initial management of kidney disease are provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Steps for screening and initial management of kidney disease.
Figure 1. Steps for Screening and Initial Management of Kidney Disease
a The Infectious Disease Society of America indicates viral load levels of >4000 copies/mL and CD4 counts of <350 cells/mm3 as risk factors for kidney disease.11
b See Section VI. B. Management of Comorbid Hyperglycemia, Dyslipidemia, Anemia, and Hypertension.
c See Antiretroviral Therapy: Section III. When to Initiate ART in Patients with Chronic Infection.

back to top

A. Renal Sonogram

A renal sonogram provides information about kidney size and structure and can demonstrate obstructive uropathy or small, echogenic kidneys diagnostic of chronic disease. The test is readily available, noninvasive, and inexpensive and should be performed in all patients with ARF or CKD.

back to top

B. Kidney Biopsy

The indications for performing a kidney biopsy in HIV-infected patients are difficult to generalize and should not be different from those of non-HIV-infected patients. Biopsies have the greatest clinical utility in patients with acute glomerulonephritis or unexplained CKD, especially in the setting of heavy proteinuria (defined as 24-hour urinary protein excretion of >2000 mg or protein-to-creatinine ratio >2000 mg/g creatinine) or in patients with relatively rapid decreases in GFR, because they are at high risk for progression to ESRD.

Most nephrologists would treat a proteinuric patient (e.g., 24-hour urinary protein excretion of >300 mg/g or protein-to-creatinine ratio of >200 mg/g creatinine) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), regardless of whether or not a biopsy is obtained (see Section VI. B. Management of Comorbid Hyperglycemia, Dyslipidemia, Anemia, and Hypertension).

back to top

C. Diagnosis of HIV Associated Nephropathy

In circumstances when a kidney biopsy is not performed for an HIV-infected patient with kidney dysfunction, because of contraindication, clinician judgment, or patient preference, the following diagnostic criteria for HIV-associated nephropathy are reasonable (BIII):

  • No other explainable cause(s) of kidney disease and
  • Proteinuria of >2000 mg and
  • Normal to large echogenic kidneys on sonogram and
  • Black race

For patients with empirically diagnosed HIV-associated nephropathy whose kidney disease worsens after initiation of ART, a biopsy should be performed to determine the underlying cause. (AIII)

The first reports of AIDS-related kidney disease appeared in the mid-1980s and described immunosuppressed patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria who progressed to renal failure and required dialysis within several weeks after presentation.23 These were cases of what is now recognized as HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN), a kidney disease with a pathogenesis that is directly related to the expression of HIV mRNA or DNA in glomerular and tubule epithelial cells, leading to renal damage through pro-inflammatory cytokines.24,25 HIVAN is a combined glomerular and tubule disorder, with collapsing glomerulopathy, focal glomerulosclerosis, microcystic tubule damage, varying degrees of interstitial inflammation, and tubular atrophy.23,26,27 The disease has been described in black patients at much higher rates than other racial populations and occurs primarily in patients with advanced HIV disease. A genetic polymorphism on chromosome 22 may explain this racial predilection.

In the era of ART, HIVAN has become more indolent, which makes it difficult to distinguish from other forms of kidney disease with clinical assessment alone. HIVAN is a pathologic entity that is distinct from other kidney diseases. Black race, high viral load level, low CD4 cell count, and heavy proteinuria (24-hour urinary protein excretion of >2000 mg or protein-to-creatinine ratio >2000 mg/g creatinine) predict the presence of HIVAN. However, no guidelines currently exist for diagnosing HIVAN in the absence of biopsy. According to biopsy studies, the predictive value of clinical signs alone are not very specific.28,29

back to top


Patients with low-grade proteinuria and/or slightly decreased glomerular filtration rate should receive ART if not already receiving it, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and careful monitoring of kidney function.

Clinicians should consult with a nephrologist when managing patients who are approaching end-stage renal disease due to stage 4 to 5 chronic kidney disease (see Table 1) and require special interventions for hyperparathyroidism, anemia, hemodialysis vascular access, peritoneal dialysis, and/or kidney transplant options. (AII)

back to top

A. Use of ART to Prevent Progression of Kidney Disease

Clinicians should educate patients with HIV-associated nephropathy about the increased urgency of initiating ART (see Antiretroviral Therapy: Section III: When to Initiate ART in Patients with Chronic Infection). (AII)

The incidence and spectrum of kidney diseases in HIV have been dramatically altered by ART. The risk for ESRD has been reduced, survival on dialysis among HIV-infected patients approaches survival for non-HIV-infected patients, and kidney transplantation is a viable option.30-33 One multicenter study demonstrated a 3-year survival rate of 83% among HIV-infected patients.34 Survival on dialysis is expected to continue to improve with newer antiretroviral drug therapies.31

Several case reports provide evidence that ART reverses the structural and functional abnormalities associated with HIVAN.35-37 Patients with HIVAN who are receiving effective ART have a slower decrease in GFR3,38,39 and experience fewer incidents of fulminant renal failure.33 ART is responsible for at least a 30% reduction in new ESRD cases from HIVAN.32

ART-naïve patients should be educated about the increased importance of initiating ART in the presence of HIVAN, and patients with low-grade proteinuria and/or slightly decreased GFR should initiate ART if not already receiving it. However, initiation of ART may not have a beneficial effect on the natural history of other forms of CKD, such as IgA nephropathy and diabetes, which could be mistaken for HIVAN when a biopsy is not obtained. If kidney disease worsens after initiating ART, a biopsy should be performed to determine the underlying cause.

back to top

B. Management of Comorbid Hyperglycemia, Dyslipidemia, Anemia, and Hypertension

Clinicians should treat hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, anemia, and hypertension in HIV-infected patients with kidney disease according to standard guidelines22,40-42 for non-HIV-infected patients. (AI)

HIV-infected normotensive patients with kidney disease should receive angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers according to standard guidelines for non-HIV-infected patients. (AI)

For most patients, the most effective approach to CKD treatment is effective medical management of two major risk factors: diabetes and hypertension.

HIV-infected patients with low-grade proteinuria and/or slightly decreased GFR should receive ART if not already receiving it, an ACE inhibitor or ARB, and careful monitoring of kidney function. HIV-infected patients with kidney disease who have hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, anemia, or hypertension should receive management and treatment according to standard guidelines22,40-42 for the non-HIV-infected population. Guidelines for treating hypertension in HIV-infected patients with kidney disease, including antihypertensive therapy for normotensive patients with proteinuria, are the same as those for non-HIV-infected patients. Standard ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy should also be considered for normotensive patients with HIVAN.11

back to top

C. Management Considerations Requiring Referral to a Nephrologist

Clinicians should refer HIV-infected patients with kidney disease to a nephrologist when:

  • Considering management with steroids, immunosuppression, hemodialysis, or transplantation (AIII)
  • A diagnosis of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis has been made for HIV/HCV co-infected patients (AIII)

Consultation with a nephrologist can be useful at any stage of a patient’s kidney disease to guide clinical examination and interpret findings. Referral to a nephrologist is recommended when treatment for a patient’s kidney disease becomes complex, such as when steroids, immunosuppression, hemodialysis, transplantation, or treatment for membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) may be required.

Steroids and Immunosuppression
Steroids have been used in HIVAN because they can reduce urinary protein excretion and/or improve GFR in other kidney diseases, such as idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and interstitial nephritis. In nonrandomized trials, kidney function can stabilize or improve in steroid-treated patients.43

Hemodialysis and Transplantation
Proper planning for hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or kidney transplantation should be managed by a nephrologist, well in advance of uremic symptoms. In patients who are likely to begin hemodialysis, an arteriovenous fistula should be created months before an anticipated start date. Dose adjustments for ART in patients on hemodialysis have been well established44 and are available in Antiretroviral Therapy: Appendix A.

Successful results have been demonstrated in HIV-infected renal transplant patients receiving ART. The rates of both acute rejection and infection among HIV-infected patients were comparable to non-HIV-infected transplant recipients.45,46 More recently, prospective data from the Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV: Multi-Site Study demonstrated excellent patient and graft survival, despite an increased rate of acute rejection in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients.47 Clinicians should be aware of the potential for significant drug-drug interactions between ART and immunosuppressive agents.

Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis in HIV/HCV Co-infected Patients
HIV/HCV co-infection increases the risk for CKD.48,49 Antibodies to HCV can induce immune complex glomerular disease and MPGN. However, relatively few cases of MPGN have been reported in HIV-infected patients, suggesting other associations between HCV and CKD.

The decision to initiate anti-HCV therapy for HCV and MPGN is often simplified by the fact that therapy is indicated for the liver disease, irrespective of cryoglobulinemia, and a kidney biopsy is not necessary to confirm the clinical suspicion of MPGN. A more difficult decision arises when anti-HCV therapy is ineffective and the kidney disease remains active. In this setting, a kidney biopsy should be obtained to confirm the diagnosis. If MPGN is present, the patient should be referred to a nephrologist for treatment.

back to top


Clinicians should determine whether dose adjustments are required for certain antiretroviral agents or whether patients should avoid use of certain agents when glomerular filtration rate reaches ≤50 mL/min; recommendations for such considerations are provided in Table 2. (AIII)

When GFR approaches levels that suggest the need for ART dose adjustments, the decision to make adjustments should be based on trends in serum creatinine levels over time and on clinical judgment. Dose modification of antiretroviral agents may be necessary when GFR is chronically reduced. Nucleoside/nucleotide agents that are cleared renally (i.e., zidovudine, stavudine, didanosine, lamivudine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir) require dose modification when GFR is reduced. Combination pills that contain these nucleosides/nucleotides should not be used in patients with reduced GFR because the individual components require separate dosing regimens (see Table 2).

Table 2: Recommended ART Dose Adjustments at GFR ≤50 mL/mina
Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
– Adjust dose if creatinine clearance reaches
    ≤15 mL/min
– Adjust dose if creatinine clearance reaches
    ≤50 mL/min

– Avoid or use with caution when didanosine is co-administered
    with tenofovir in renal failure

CCR5 Co-Receptor Agonists
– Adjust dose if creatinine clearance reaches
    <30 mL/min and patient experiences postural hypotension
Co-Formulated Agents
– Do not use if creatinine clearance reaches
    <50 mL/min

– Individual components should be administered with
    appropriate dose adjustments

– Do not use if creatinine clearance reaches
    <30 mL/min
a Clinicians should refer to prescribing information for individual agents when a patient has reduced GFR (see Antiretroviral Therapy).
b The manufacturer recommends adjustment at ≤60 mL/min for didanosine; however, adjustment at ≤50 mL/min is a reasonable approach.
c Alternative antiretroviral agents should be considered in patients with renal insufficiency.
d Avoid use in patients with creatinine clearance of <70 mL/min at initiation of treatment.

back to top

A. Tenofovir

For patients receiving tenofovir-containing regimens, clinicians should:

  • Estimate glomerular filtration rate at initiation of therapy, 1 month after initiation of therapy, and at least every 4 months thereafter (BII)
  • Adjust tenofovir dosing when glomerular filtration rate approaches 50 mL/min or discontinue tenofovir according to clinical status (AII)
  • Withhold tenofovir until all potential causes have been determined in patients who develop acute renal failure (BII)

Tenofovir-associated kidney disease is characterized either by a decrease in GFR or by tubule dysfunction, such as Fanconi syndrome (tubular injury with hypophosphatemia, euglycemic glycosuria, tubule proteinuria, uric acid wasting, and aminoaciduria). For prescribing information, see the package insert.

For patients receiving a tenofovir-containing ART regimen, GFR should be assessed at initiation of therapy, 1 month after initiation of therapy, and at least every 4 months thereafter. Product labeling recommends routine monitoring of serum phosphate levels, but there is little evidence to suggest that serum phosphate is a sensitive or specific marker of tubule dysfunction, nor is it a more sensitive indicator for tenofovir-associated renal dysfunction than measuring GFR (serum creatinine) alone. There are insufficient data to support tenofovir dose adjustment or discontinuation based on low serum phosphate alone. However, the combination of reduced GFR and hypophosphatemia is highly suggestive of tenofovir-associated renal dysfunction, and tenofovir should be dose-adjusted according to GFR or discontinued according to clinical status. Concomitant use of nephrotoxic agents should be avoided in these circumstances.

As an initial regimen, tenofovir is relatively contraindicated in patients with preexisting kidney disease and GFR levels near 50 to 60 mL/min. Tenofovir should be dose-adjusted when GFR approaches 50 mL/min. Both the renal and nonrenal safety profiles, as well as the efficacy, of alternative regimens play an important role in the decision to switch regimens. The decision to continue treatment in patients with gradually decreasing GFR and CKD, such as in patients with hypertension or diabetes, is more complex and should be individualized. The underlying cause of kidney disease should be considered, as should the likelihood that kidney function may stabilize or improve after stopping tenofovir. When patients develop ARF while receiving tenofovir, the drug should be withheld until all potential causes have been determined.

For additional ART dosing information, see Antiretroviral Therapy: Appendix A.

back to top

B. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

Clinicians should assess for use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in HIV-infected patients with declining renal function. Decisions about the use of such agents for these patients should be individualized and patients should be educated about the importance of using these drugs with caution. (BII)

Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which is common among HIV-infected patients with pain syndromes, may exacerbate kidney disease. NSAID use should be assessed, and these agents should be used with caution, in the setting of declining renal function.

back to top


1. Gardner LI, Holmberg SD, Williamson JM, et al. Development of proteinuria or elevated serum creatinine and mortality in HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;32:203-209. [PubMed]

2. Gardner LI, Klein RS, Szczech LA, et al. Rates and risk factors for condition-specific hospitalizations in HIV-infected and uninfected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;34:320-330. [PubMed]

3. Szczech LA, Hoover DR, Feldman JG, et al. Association between renal disease and outcomes among HIV-infected women receiving or not receiving antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1199-1206. [PubMed]

4. Winston J, Deray G, Hawkins T, et al. Kidney disease in patients with HIV infection and AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:1449-1457. [PubMed]

5. Pullinger CR, Aouizerat BE, Gay C, et al. Metabolic abnormalities and coronary heart disease risk in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2010;8:279-286. [PubMed]

6. Ibrahim F, Naftalin C, Cheserem E, et al. Immunodeficiency and renal impairment are risk factors for HIV-associated acute renal failure. AIDS 2010;24:2239-2244. [PubMed]

7. Choi AI, Rodriguez RA, Bacchetti P, et al. Racial differences in end-stage renal disease rates in HIV infection versus diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2968-2974. [PubMed]

8. Wearne N, Swanepoel CR, Boulle A, et al. The spectrum of renal histologies seen in HIV with outcomes, prognostic indicators and clinical correlations. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012. In press. [PubMed]

9. Lescure FX, Flateau C, Pacanowski J, et al. HIV-associated kidney glomerular diseases: Changes with time and HAART. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:2349-2355. [PubMed]

10. Schrier RW, Wang W, Poole B, et al. Acute renal failure: Definitions, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy. J Clin Invest 2004;114:5-14. [PubMed]

11. Gupta SK, Eustace JA, Winston JA, et al. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease in HIV-infected patients: Recommendations of the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:1559-1585. [PubMed]

12. Wyatt CM, Winston JA, Malvestutto CD, et al. Chronic kidney disease in HIV infection: An urban epidemic. AIDS 2007;21:2101-2113. [PubMed]

13. Kao WH, Klag MJ, Meoni LA, et al. MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans. Nat Genet 2008;40:1185-1192. [PubMed]

14. Kopp JB, Smith MW, Nelson GW, et al. MYH9 is a major-effect risk gene for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet 2008;40:1175-1184. [PubMed]

15. Nelson GW, Freedman BI, Bowden DW, et al. Dense mapping of MYH9 localizes the strongest kidney disease associations to the region of introns 13 to 15. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:1805-1815. [PubMed]

16. Behar DM, Rosset S, Tzur S, et al. African ancestry allelic variation at the MYH9 gene contributes to increased susceptibility to non-diabetic end-stage kidney disease in Hispanic Americans. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:1816-1827. [PubMed]

17. Genovese G, Tonna SJ, Knob AU, et al. A risk allele for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in African Americans is located within a region containing APOL1 and MYH9. Kidney Int 2010;78:698-704. [PubMed]

18. Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Lloyd A, et al. Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA 2010;303:423-429. [PubMed]

19. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 2012;367:20-29. [PubMed]

20. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1296-1305. [PubMed]

21. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care 2012;35(Suppl 1):S11-S63. Available at:

22. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-S266. Available at:

23. Rao TK, Filippone EJ, Nicastri AD, et al. Associated focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1984;310:669-673. [PubMed]

24. Bruggeman LA, Ross MD, Tanji N, et al. Renal epithelium is a previously unrecognized site of HIV-1 infection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:2079-2087. [PubMed]

25. Ross MJ, Fan C, Ross MD, et al. HIV-1 infection initiates an inflammatory cascade in human renal tubular epithelial cells. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006;42:1-11. [PubMed]

26. Humphreys MH. HIV-associated glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int 1995;48:311-320. [PubMed]

27. D’Agati V, Appel GB. HIV infection and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:138-152. [PubMed]

28. Szczech LA, Gupta SK, Habash R, et al. The clinical epidemiology and course of the spectrum of renal diseases associated with HIV infection. Kidney Int 2004; 66:1145-1152. [PubMed]

29. Estrella M, Fine DM, Gallant JE, et al. HIV type 1 RA level as a clinical indicator of renal pathology in HIV-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:377-380. [PubMed]

30. National Institutes of Health. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007. Available at:

31. Ahuja TS, Grady J, Khan S. Changing trends in the survival of dialysis patients with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1889-1893. [PubMed]

32. Schwartz EJ, Szczech LA, Ross MJ, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and the epidemic of HIV+ end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:2412-2420. [PubMed]

33. Lucas GM, Eustace JA, Sozio S, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and the incidence of HIV-1-associated nephropathy: A 12-year cohort study. AIDS 2004;18:541-546. [PubMed]

34. Roland ME, Barin B, Carlson L, et al. HIV-infected liver and kidney transplant recipients: 1- and 3-year outcomes. Am J Transplant 2008;8:355-365. [PubMed]

35. Wali RK, Drachenberg CI, Papadimitriou JC, et al. HIV-1-associated nephropathy and response to highly-active antiretroviral therapy. Lancet 1998;352:783-784.

36. Winston JA, Bruggeman LA, Ross MD, et al. Nephropathy and establishment of a renal reservoir of HIV type 1 during primary infection. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1979-1984. [PubMed]

37. Scheurer D. Rapid reversal of renal failure after initiation of HAART: A case report. AIDS Read 2004;14:443-447. [PubMed]

38. Cosgrove CJ, Abu-Alfa AK, Perazella MA. Observations on HIV-associated renal disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Am J Med Sci 2002;323:102-106. [PubMed]

39. Atta MG, Gallant JE, Rahman MH, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in the treatment of HIV-associated nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2809-2813. [PubMed]

40. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41(3 Suppl):S1-S91. Available at:

41. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2006;47(5 Suppl 3):S1-S145. Available at:

42. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43(5 Suppl 1):S1-290. Available at:

43. Eustace JA, Nuermberger E, Choi M, et al. Cohort study of the treatment of severe HIV-associated nephropathy with corticosteroids. Kidney Int 2000;58:1253-1260. [PubMed]

44. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. March 27, 2012. Available at:

45. Gruber SA, Doshi MD, Cincotta E, et al. Preliminary experience with renal transplantation in HIV+ recipients: Low acute rejection and infection rates. Transplantation 2008;86:269-274. [PubMed]

46. Locke JE, Montgomery RA, Warren DS, et al. Renal transplant in HIV-positive patients: Long-term outcomes and risk factors for graft loss. Arch Surg 2009;144:83-86. [PubMed]

47. Stock PG, Barin B, Murphy B, et al. Outcomes of kidney transplantation in HIV-infected recipients. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2004-2014. [PubMed]

48. Wyatt CM, Malvestutto C, Coca SG, et al. The impact of hepatitis C virus coinfection on HIV-related kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 2008;22:1799-807. [PubMed]

49. Fischer MJ, Wyatt CM, Gordon K, et al. Hepatitis C and the risk of kidney disease and mortality in veterans with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010;53:222-226. [PubMed]

back to top


Bakris GL, Williams M, Dworkin L, et al. Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: A consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:646-661. [PubMed]

Bica I, McGovern B, Dhar R, et al. Increasing mortality due to end-stage liver disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:492-497. [PubMed]

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560-2572. [PubMed]

Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;41:1-12. [PubMed]

Husain M, D’Agati VD, He JC, et al. HIV-1 Nef induces dedifferentiation of podocytes in vivo: A characteristic feature of HIVAN. AIDS 2005;19:1975-1980. [PubMed]

Jain AB, Eghtesad B, Venkataramanan R, et al. Ribavirin dose modification based on renal function is necessary to reduce hemolysis in liver transplant patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Transpl 2002;8:1007-1013. [PubMed]

Kalayjian RC, Franceschini N, Gupta SK, et al. Suppression of HIV-1 replication by antiretroviral therapy improves renal function in persons with low CD4 cell counts and chronic kidney disease. AIDS 2008;22:481-487. [PubMed]

Kamar N, Rostaing L, Alric L. Treatment of hepatitis C-virus-related glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 2006;69:436-439. [PubMed]

Mehta RL, McDonald B, Gabbai FB, et al. A randomized clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int 2001;60:1154-1163. [PubMed]

Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, et al. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S79-S83. [PubMed]

Paganini EP, Larive B, Kanagasundaram NS. Severity scores and outcomes with acute renal failure in the ICU setting. Contrib Nephrol 2001;132:181-195. [PubMed]

Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, et al. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2049-2060. [PubMed]

Silvester W, Bellomo R, Cole L. Epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure of critical illness in Australia. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1910-1915. [PubMed]

Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: A pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;51:395-406. [PubMed]

Stock PG, Roland ME. Evolving clinical strategies for transplantation in the HIV-positive recipient. Transplantation 2007;84:563-571. [PubMed]

Szczech LA, Gange SJ, van der Horst C, et al. Predictors of proteinuria and renal failure among women with HIV infection. Kidney Int 2002;61:195-202. [PubMed]

Szczech LA, Grunfeld C, Scherzer R, et al. Microalbuminuria in HIV infection. AIDS 2007;21:1003-1009. [PubMed]

back to top


Appendix A: Prevalence and Complications of Acute Renal Failure in HIV-Infected Patients
Cohort Characteristics
HIV-infected patients in ambulatory care (2005)1
  • Among 754 HIV-infected patients in ambulatory care, 10% experienced at least one episode of ARF over 2 years
  • More than half of the ARF episodes were attributed to underlying infections, 76% of which were AIDS-defining illnesses
  • Complications of drug therapy accounted for nearly one-third of ARF cases; conventional antibiotics and antifungal agents were the primary agents that caused the complications
  • Liver disease accounted for approximately 10% of cases, and HCV co-infection and lower CD4 cell counts were identified as independent risk factors
Hospital discharges in New York State (2006)2
  • In an analysis of administrative data from more than 2 million hospital discharges in New York State, HIV infection was associated with a 2.8-fold increase in documented ARF
  • ARF was associated with a nearly 6-fold increase in in-hospital mortality


1. Franceschini N, Napravnik S, Eron JJ Jr, et al. Incidence and etiology of acute renal failure among ambulatory HIV-infected patients. Kidney Int 2005;67:1526-1531. [PubMed]

2. Wyatt CM, Arons RR, Klotman PE, et al. Acute renal failure in hospitalized patients with HIV: Risk factors and impact on in-hospital mortality. AIDS 2006;20:561-565. [PubMed]

back to top


Appendix B: Prevalence Reports of Chronic Kidney Disease in HIV-Infected Patients
Study Characteristics of Cohort
  • A total of 3.5% of patients with HIV-1 infection had a GFR <60 mL/min
  • The low prevalence might be explained by: 1) the predominantly white study population, in whom risk for kidney disease is lower than in blacks; and 2) lack of information about proteinuria
  • Kidney disease was present in 7.2% of HIV-infected women at baseline and developed in an additional 14% over a mean follow-up period of 21 months1
  • This study defined kidney disease as serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dL or urine dipstick >2+ protein on any research visit; such criteria omitted patients with a low GFR and a serum creatinine <1.4 mg/dL and likely underestimated CKD prevalence
National Sample of US Veterans Affairs Patients
  • A total of 7.1% of HIV-infected individuals had a GFR
    <60 mL/min,2 whereas an analysis of HIV-infected patients in an urban AIDS center found 15.5% had low GFR or proteinuria3
Fat Redistribution and Metabolic Change in HIV Infection (FRAM)
  • Microalbuminuria, which is predictive of kidney disease in diabetic patients, was detected in 11% of HIV-infected participants


1. Gardner LI, Holmberg SD, Williamson JM, et al. Development of proteinuria or elevated serum creatinine and mortality in HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;32:203-209. [PubMed]

2. Choi AI, Rodriguez RA, Bacchetti P, et al. Racial differences in end-stage renal disease rates in HIV infection versus diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2968-2974. [PubMed]

3. Wyatt CM, Winston JA, Malvestutto CD, et al. Chronic kidney disease in HIV infection: An urban epidemic. AIDS 2007;21:2101-2113. [PubMed]

back to top